Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity

Publikasi Unusia

Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity

Tampilkan catatan item sederhana

dc.contributor.advisor ADRIYENDI, M.KOM.
dc.contributor.author ADRIYENDI, M.KOM.
dc.contributor.editor ADRIYENDI, M.KOM.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-24T03:45:47Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-24T03:45:47Z
dc.date.copyright Semua hak cipta dilindungi oleh Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Batusangkar
dc.date.issued 2016-08-29
dc.identifier.issn 2005-4246
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.uri http://ecampus.iainbatusangkar.ac.id:80/batusangkar/FilePengajuanArtikel?id=28
dc.description.abstract This paper provided an overview of analysis and implementation clustering for food productivity. Food productivity is determined by food production. Rice is one of staple food in Indonesia. Rice production is influencing adequacy level of national food production. Rice productivity is very important to accomplishment food affordability. Rice productivity per province in Indonesia must be increased, because large population and high consumption. Rice productivity that fluctuates and tends to decrease, need to clustering to determinant category cluster of productivity. Clustering is using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means. Method improvement of K-Means is modification Intra Cluster Distance and Inter Cluster Distance. Calculate distance (Inter Cluster Distance and Intra Cluster Distance) to evaluate the clustering results and to compare the efficiency of the clustering algorithms. Method improvement of Fuzzy C-Means is modification algorithm, alternative process and iteration. Data processing is using Excel software. Clustering produce three cluster (C1, C2, C3) is convergence. Measurement cluster based on comparison of membership cluster, consistency, and productivity. Membership cluster, there is point data anomaly (x22, x23, x29, x33). Consistency data on K-Means (C1 = 72.73%, C2 = 93.75%, C3 = 100%). Consistency data on Fuzzy C-Means (C1 = 100%, C2 = 88.33%, C3 = 87.50%). Rice Productivity is Cluster 1 (decrease), Cluster 2 (decrease, except 3 provinces), and Cluster 3 (increase, except 1 province). Majority in rice productivity is 70.59%. Result of clustering showed that majority rice productivity on category cluster is low productivity.
dc.language English
dc.publisher ADRIYENDI, M.KOM.
dc.subject Keywords: Clustering, K-Means, Fuzzy C-Means, Food, Rice Productivity
dc.title Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity
dc.type Jurnal Internasional


File dalam item ini

File Ukuran Format Lihat Deskripsi
1564394432286_A ... +3+-+Food+Productivity.pdf 767.5Kb application/pdf Lihat / Buka Proposal Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity
1582515951137_A ... ew - Food Productivity.pdf 176.7Kb application/pdf Lihat / Buka Peer Review Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity
1582515951370_A ... roductivity_compressed.pdf 887.4Kb application/pdf Lihat / Buka Plagiat Checker Clustering using K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means on Food Productivity

Item ini muncul di Koleksi berikut

Tampilkan catatan item sederhana

Telusuri Repositori


Pencarian Lanjutan

Jelajahi

Akun Saya